Cited by 4,001Statistical Methods and ApplicationsEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models

FITTING MULTIVARIATE MODELS TO COMMUNITY DATA: A COMMENT ON DISTANCE-BASED REDUNDANCY ANALYSIS

McArdle, Brian H., Anderson, Marti J.·2001·Ecology

Abstract

Nonparametric multivariate analysis of ecological data using permutation tests has two main challenges: (1) to partition the variability in the data according to a complex design or model, as is often required in ecological experiments, and (2) to base the analysis on a multivariate distance measure (such as the semimetric Bray-Curtis measure) that is reasonable for ecological data sets. Previous nonparametric methods have succeeded in one or other of these areas, but not in both. A recent contribution to Ecological Monographs by Legendre and Anderson, called distance-based redundancy analysis (db-RDA), does achieve both. It does this by calculating principal coordinates and subsequently correcting for negative eigenvalues, if they are present, by adding a constant to squared distances. We show here that such a correction is not necessary. Partitioning can be achieved directly from the distance matrix itself, with no corrections and no eigenanalysis, even if the distance measure used is semimetric. An ecological example is given to show the differences in these statistical methods. Empirical simulations, based on parameters estimated from real ecological species abundance data, showed that db-RDA done on multifactorial designs (using the correction) does not have type 1 error consistent with the significance level chosen for the analysis (i.e., does not provide an exact test), whereas the direct method described and advocated here does.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[0290:fmmtcd]2.0.co;2

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For Euclidean distances computed on a single modality, MDMR is equivalent to multivariate multiple regression (MMR) using a pseudo-F statistic.

    “For Euclidean distances computed on a single modality, MDMR is equivalent to multivariate multiple regression (MMR) using a pseudo-F statistic (McArdle and Anderson 2001).”

    From Similarity-based multimodal regression (2024) · cites this paper as McArdle and Anderson 2001

  • With a univariate outcome and Euclidean distance, MDMR is equivalent to the standard regression F-statistic if appropriate degrees of freedom are accommodated.

    “With a univariate outcome and Euclidean distance, it is equivalent to the standard regression F -statistic if appropriate degrees of freedom are accommodated (McArdle and Anderson 2001).”

    From Similarity-based multimodal regression (2024) · cites this paper as McArdle and Anderson 2001

  • For a single data modality, multivariate distance matrix regression provides a distance-based framework for regression accommodating a wide range of data types.

    “For a single data modality, multivariate distance matrix regression provides a distance-based framework for regression accommodating a wide range of data types.”

    From Similarity-based multimodal regression (2024) · cites this paper as McArdle and Anderson, 2001

  • Discarding imaginary cMDS axes might lead to conservative tests.

    “One solution is to discard imaginary cMDS axes; however, McArdle and Anderson (2001) show that this might lead to conservative tests.”

    From Similarity-based multimodal regression (2024) · cites this paper as McArdle and Anderson (2001)

  • PERMANOVA was performed on the MLG abundance profile of all samples to assess impact from each of the factors listed.

    “PERMANOVA39 was performed on the MLG abundance profile of all samples to assess impact from each of the factors listed (Supplementary Table 2).”

    From The gut microbiome in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (2017) · cites this paper as [39]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McArdle, B. H., & Anderson, M. J.
Affiliations
University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
Anderson, Marti J.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-01
Volume
82
Issue
1
Pages
290-297
ISSN
0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2149421543
Cited by
4,001
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 154 · 2025: 181 · 2024: 197 · 2023: 211 · 2022: 235 · 2021: 282 · 2020: 253 · 2019: 224 · 2018: 233 · 2017: 213 · 2016: 223 · 2015: 234 · 2014: 210 · 2013: 218 · 2012: 204
FWCI
23.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ecology (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Sydney
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
Keywords
distance-based redundancy analysis, permutation tests, Bray-Curtis distance, principal coordinates, negative eigenvalues, type I error, species abundance data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review